Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Best of Blog!!
Benji, the Harvey.
best of blog
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Bestest of Blog
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Quag-Miers.
For my final paper, I intend to compare how two newspapers from the same city framed a recent news story, the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court. The two papers I chose were the Washington Times (generally regarded as a more conservative publication), and the Washington Post (generally regarded as a more liberal publication). My research also extends to statements made by the administration pertaining to the Miers nomination (specifically statements from the President himself), and background information about Miers as found on Wikipedia.org. By evaluating how this issue was framed, I seek to understand the intention of each publication in its slant, and whether or not such allegations are entirely true.
Monday, December 05, 2005
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution
Happy now Greg?
I actually have something done today. I went out and found some sources and I even have a rough draft. Now that I've shocked you all my paper will be following the recently revisited discussion of Intelligent Design Theory and Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution. The first part of my paper will be an objective look at the arguments of each side. The second part will be me putting forth my own thoughts and opinions after I have done the research required to make an informed decision.
Sunday, December 04, 2005
The Internet and the Public Sphere/Cyberdemocracy
The economically disadvantaged are left out of the democratic process because they cannot afford internet services. Many minority groups are inclded in those that lack a great socioeconomic status, therefore their thoughts are also neglected in this process. Only 30,000,000 out of almost 300,000,000 people in the United States are online, which counts for only about 10% of the population that can vote. Many people would have to be able to gain access to the web in order to participate in the debate forums, in which do not necessarily work anyhow.
Many of the debates rarely come to a common public opinion, which is the purpose of the debate rooms. The only commonalities occur seem to happen after the members of the chats separate into their respective groups. Quickly the participants form into sects after figuring out what beliefs they have in common. Of course there are the people that sign onto a debate forum, but never really participate and maybe utter a sentence or two, here and there. However, when a politician is identified in the debate forum, the debaters automatically flock to his debate room and hang on to every word that he says. A participatory democracy is supposed to put the formulation of important issues that need to be addressed into the hands of the electorate, but these debate forums only give the government and politicians another pathway to influence more possible voters.
Another problem surrounding a cyber democracy is the growing possibility for corruption of the government. Online conversations are very difficult to monitor, and the federal government will grow nervous about what is being said in these debates and chats on the web. One way they may try to solve the problem would be to create and provide software that gives access to the wealth of information about politics that allows the people to form their opinions. The problem with this is that it is too easy and too tempting to not create biased opinions throughout the materials present in the software. Media's influence will still be there, even though the move to the internet as our public sphere is trying to avoid media bias and conglomerates. On the other hand, the government could begin to figure out ways to control the debate forums, and to monitor conversations of the citizens. With the possibility of anarchists uniting and the open invitations to criminals who will steal identities, or use fake ones to con people, the federal government will be called upon to regulate the internet, which would be a very difficult task. This, however, will lead to violations of our freedom of speech, and an even larger uproar will occur.
The ideals of the cyber democracy and creating a public sphere on the internet are with good intention, but they are unrealistic and, in the end, impractical. The many problems that will occur outweigh the good that will come out of it. Technology such as the internet creates for a vast amount of opportunities, but to revolutionize our entire democratic system according to the internet and online access is not safe or secure for many different reasons.
Abstract Revision...yeah, it's really late...
Monday, November 28, 2005
Propsal
Cultural Choice (aka really late abstract)
Public Libraries: Their History and Existence in the Public Sphere
So, through this paper, I am hoping to find my thoughts on those two topics. I have looked at the works of Fred Lerner, and hope to continue and compliment his work by adding a new dimension to his thoughts. I also hope to reflect on how libraries have entered his computer age, and how they will continue to thrive, if they continue to thrive. I also wish to take a look at the work of Dr. Ann Curry, who has written about the use of the public libraries, and the ways that they can facilitate public discourse. I see literacy as a key to democracy, and libraries as a pathway toward that literacy.
I hope to look not only at the history of public libraries in the United States, but to also look at their development in the developing world. I want to pursue the history of the Carnegie Library, both domestically and internationally, and hope to reason if they are, and how they are continuing to serve their purpose.
Finally, I plan to talk briefly about questions dealing with censorship. Where, as a librarian, do you draw the line between information that benefits the public, and the information that harms. It is a tricky balancing act, and one that has inspired much debate over the years.
Saturday, November 26, 2005
Starting Foreign Language Young
Since I was interested in Pratt’s “speech community” that she described as being an essential part of the contact zone, I decided to use language as a basis of my final paper. Since I am an elementary education major, the issue of foreign languages in the elementary schools seemed to jump out at me. Foreign language has been an increasing and prominent element of schooling for students of all ages.
There is an elementary school in
Although, the idea of foreign language being pushed into the elementary schedules is a positive long-range goal, it also is very tough to follow through with. With the amount of time given in the school day and all of the requirements that school districts and teachers have within their curriculum, it is hard for me to see how foreign language can be brought into the public school so forcefully at this point.
Throughout this paper, I will be supporting the importance of foreign language in a child’s education and how some elementary schools go through this of including foreign language. However, I will also be questioning the possibility of it while still being able to further the children’s education with the necessary curriculum already set up.
Monday, November 21, 2005
?
Saturday, November 19, 2005
Leavin' unexpectedly early for Turkey Break!
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
when can i get this paper to you?
The past few days have been insnaely hectic. I've gotten about four hours of total sleep and could just not handle going to class today. I was considering coming so i could hand in my paper, but I didn't want to just sleep in class, because that's what would've happened. I have my paper done, but i need a time and place where i can drop it off.
I'm sorry about this, and I'm getting myself back on track.
I hope I didn't miss too much.
Monday, November 14, 2005
A penny's worth of thoughts
Sunday, November 13, 2005
Madd Late
This abstract is pretty basic but give me break. I had to write two papers today.
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Immigration and "Americanization": Language as a Contact Zone
A related essay can be found here.
Friday, November 04, 2005
Untitled as of yet
This paper is my attempt to sort through the realities and the fallacies of the some of these issues, examining different works which attempt to present a realm of victimization. Are immigrants victimized in American society? Or is it all just a big scheme to attain sympathy and the upper hand in a somewhat challenging corporate society?